About Us

The Transparency and Accountability Program (TAP) is a program of The Results for Development Institute, a private nonprofit organization based in Washington, DC. Started in 2006 with suppoort from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, TAP works to increase the capacity of civil society organizations conducting research and evidence-based advocacy to reduce corruption and inefficiency in social sector public spending and better hold government accountable for equality in public resource division.  We call these types of agents Independent Monitoring Organizations (IMOs).

The activities that TAP undertakes address the major barriers that IMOs face in turning actions into results: weak institutional capacity and skills, non-existent or adversarial relationships with government and policymakers, and lack of access to information. TAP helps IMOs overcome these barriers by supporting access to information, providing both the incentive and tools to develop analytic skills and capabilities, and providing mentors and impact coaches to help connect IMOs with government and stakeholders so that their policy recommendations actually have a chance to be heard.

 

 

TAP News

On June 22nd TAP held the inaugural book launch for it’s most recent publication, From the Ground Up, at the London School of Economics. The event was moderated by Robert Wade, professor of Political Economy and Development at LSE and speakers included Paraguayan investigator Cynthia Brizuela Speratti of CADEP, one of the 19 organizations documented in the book, as well as co-authors Dr. Stephen Kosack and Courtney Tolmie.

TAP will be holding the inaugural book launch for its most recent book, “From the Ground Up”, on June 22 in London.

TAP Books and Working Papers

This book seeks out, based on a sample of countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, areas in which governments could focus to improve the quality public expenditures.  It seeks to identify cross-cutting strengths and weaknesses of public financial management and procurement systems and the characteristics of, and lessons that can be learned from reform programs.